To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Tree current |
From: | "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:08:43 +0200 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <001301c7acd6$14f492e0$15337ad5@w4o8m9> |
References: | <[email protected]> <000901c7aa26$ecfaff60$82147ad5@w4o8m9> <000d01c7aa8c$6d692860$7c0d7ad5@w4o8m9> <[email protected]> <001301c7acd6$14f492e0$15337ad5@w4o8m9> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) |
Jim, the LF group, thanks for sharing a very interesting experiment! James Moritz wrote: > Generally, trees closer to the antenna and with > bigger areas of foliage had higher currents, as you would expect. This raises the following question: http://web.telia.com/~u33233109/ I bet the answer contains the words "it depends..." ;-) 73 Johan SM6LKM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Tree current, Dave Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: T/A [137] last night : VO1NA, Jean-Pierre Méré |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Tree current, Dave Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Tree current, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |