Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: more castle

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: more castle
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:13:39 +0100
Delivered-to: daveyxm@gmail.com
In-reply-to: <20070106011110.2iu4h2bvhswggk4c@webmail.versatel.de>
References: <E1H2rvT-0004dE-TA@www9.emo.freenet-rz.de> <20070106011110.2iu4h2bvhswggk4c@webmail.versatel.de>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
Hi Uwe,

Thanks for the observation ...


seems there grows a problem: I cant see any gap btwn the letters
C and Q, D and K, K and 4, 4 and U.  but btwn Q and D es U and K
the gaps are O.K. so you will find out how to implement the gaps
btwn the other letters as well.

Ok, no problem to add a short gap between *all* letters, and a larger gap between *words*. But the result would be very similar to DFCW; while CASTLE doesn't need these spaces in most occasions (where you recognize the begin of a new letter because the first "dash" or "dot" is closest to the reference). For example, having no gap between "C" and "Q" (etc) is no problem - it just saves precious time in the TA business ;-). Anyway for the sake of readability I will add the short gap between *any* combination of letters now to keep things simple.
Have a nice weekend everyone,

73, Wolf DL4YHF






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>