LF: Overnight

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Overnight
From:	Laurence KL1X <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:29:07 -0900
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Another less than inspiring long haul night (10/11th)- DCF39/Buda still at poor levels, but intermediate paths to 2000 miles are still up from "poor" to "fair", but we start off well at dusk and signals gradually fall away thru the night - or the night side is getting topped up with particles causing attenuation later in the night.

Its really odd and that last K8 event really did/still is producing strange path affects. I left the main receiver and the Shanghai slinger on 505 for Gus and Americas but a sproggie landed in the pass band.

The internet is still awful over here - typical down loads on a frac 0.5 E1 cct are 58K and upload at 1.8Kb which means my FTP loads of Argo grabs overlap sometime or gets rejected. We are not sure when the Taiwan fiber will be repaired but its really costing businesses a huge amount of lost time. Shanghais showing some 70% of packet drops sometimes... love it.

Laurence PM01SF Sunny Shanghai 0C
http://kl1x.com

> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:10:55 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: T/A last night :onlly a few traces XES
>
> Alan,
>
> Hartmut's copy is along the same lines...weak copy of Jay early, and
> then very little after that. I note that there was an area of
> thunderstorm activity in the central Mediterranean area, but that's
> quite a distance away.
>
> I like your multiple ring theory. It did seem that signals recovered
> very quickly from the Kp=8 event. It would be nice to have some other
> data that supports the concept.
>
> For those that follow the http://www.spaceweather.com site: Some of the
> main page data is not being properly refreshed, and is a couple of days
> out of date. The underlying graphs are correct, though.
>
> One correction from last night: XES did not go on the air until 0405. I
> was a bit sleepy when I made out the log entry. It should be on by 0300
> tonight.
>
> JA
>
> Alan Melia wrote:
> > Hi John I did have static type interference here much worse that earlier in
> > the week. I have the characteristic vertical streaks.....the levels may have
> > been more continuous with Jean-Pierre. Extra-terrestrial noise would not be
> > able to penetrate the ionosphere, and there doesnt seem to be much auroral
> > activity at present. It could of course be "favourable fading", only in this
> > case favouring maybe eastern European noise source propagation. Signals here
> > were down but I only started captures about 0100z.
> >
> > There is a sign in Steve's plot, if you remove the 0700 peak, that levels
> > were dropping steadily from about 0330z. This effect is confirmed by
> > Laurence. I wonder if this just means that the Ring Current is not depleted
> > of electrons yet and is still exchanging them with the D-layer. The storm
> > that started it all was cited as "severe" (Kp=8) and we have seen in
> > previous years a storm of that magnitude delay propagation recovery by
> > upwards of 28 days. What was a surprise was the relatively shallow dip in
> > Dst it produced (only down to -160nT, when we could quite easily have
> > expented -300nT) and then the very rapid initial "recovery".
> >
> > I do not have the expertise to pontificate on this but I am wondering
> > whether, because there are several "orbits" in the Ring Current, these
> > severe storms populate the outer (higher energy?) ones more heavily and
> > these electrons take longer to decay to an energy where they can be
> > precipitated. It is undoubtedly much more complex than that (it always is
> > !!).....but it makes a good simple story !!
> >
> > Thanks to all for all the data and reports without which, it would be
> > impossible to concoct these "off the wall" theories.....even if they are
> > hopelessy incorrect it is great fun !
> >
> > Cheers de Alan G3NYK
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John Andrews <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 10 January 2007 11:58
> > Subject: Re: LF: Re: T/A last night :onlly a few traces XES
> >
> >
> >> Jean-Pierre, Jay,
> >>
> >> XES did not go on the air until 0305 UTC last night. I am puzzled as to
> >> why conditions were so poor for both stations. It will be interesting to
> >> see Hartmut's report.
> >>
> >> John Andrews
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Try amazing new 3D maps Check it out!

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Overnight, Laurence KL1X <=

Previous by Date:	LF: 505 kHz, Hans-Joachim Brandt
Next by Date:	LF: T/A last night : XGJ , XES, Jean-Pierre Méré
Previous by Thread:	LF: 505 kHz, Hans-Joachim Brandt
Next by Thread:	LF: 505,1KHz, Walter Staubach
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]