LF: Re: TEST

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: TEST
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:17:16 +0100
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=YCEFTVUWIsMXrdIXNeKoAfAyrshVis02UPFPBWxuDg/zc+/03XaAXFrvwyDAdcTXbsK0z4ue+H25c+nG9L3xCAxzp2c+ODDjXQjebJ29schzGp/3metraYGbd531xhvTMUiU4iU6w7D7PQUmXo7MP/p9Gn2VDyW2fGpYO58SDNs= ;
Domainkey-status:	bad (test mode)
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Nope that is timestamped in my inbox at 2123z.
Alan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 17 October 2006 22:22
Subject: LF: TEST


> Hartmut Wolff schrieb:
> > Sorry, this mail appeared here after 20 hours.
> >
> > 73
> > Hartmut
> >   
> 
> Test-test-test.. sent 2006-10-17 21:23 UTC.. maybe the problem is 
> DL-wide :-) ?
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Alan Melia LF: TEST, Wolf DL4YHF LF: RE: TEST, Nick Mclean (SYD) LF: RE: RE: TEST, Nick Mclean (SYD) LF: Re: TEST, Alan Melia <= Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23 Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Jean-Pierre Méré Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Hartmut Wolff

Previous by Date:	LF: RE: RE: TEST, Nick Mclean (SYD)
Next by Date:	LF: T/A last night : XES,XNS,XGJ, Jean-Pierre Méré
Previous by Thread:	LF: RE: RE: TEST, Nick Mclean (SYD)
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]