| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: T/A Sep, 9th |
| From: | John Andrews <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:46:14 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Hartmut,Thanks for the report, and the shorter runs. A 2-way QSO could be done quite efficiently at those signal levels. I am open for suggestions about tonight. I can stick with WOLF, or try something else. Does anyone have any thoughts? John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: T/A Sep, 9th, Hartmut Wolff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Big signal with hum..., uwe-jannsen |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: T/A Sep, 9th, Hartmut Wolff |
| Next by Thread: | LF: QRV 137.7 DFCW/QRSS, Dick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |