Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RU6LA acty Apr 29-30

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: RU6LA acty Apr 29-30
From: Ed Lesnichy <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:47:04 +0400
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Ed Lesnichy
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear LF enthusiasts,

in my opinion the ppropagation in R6L was bad on Apr 29-30
though I RX and work UA0AET at Apr 29 in first time (QRB=3731km)
UA0AET's signal was quite good, but has decreased after 1740z and
has disappeared after 19z - sunset in R6L abt 1630z
(on argopics AET's report "LA O UA0..." - pick on "O" abt 1720z in 30s
mode)
Apr 29 I have made 2 new rare calls: SP0TPAX (the signal him was in the
beginning only on О©╫ in 3s mode!) and R20CH (20 years of Chernobyl tragedy)

All European signals were very weak both days, as well as level DCF39.
Sometimes it seemed that at me not in the order the RX setup, but
UA4WPF's signals level (QRB=1417km to NNE) was strong in 3s mode both days
GRI QRM-lines were very insignificant (the main parameter of good
propagation for me on my aperiodic beverages)

Attention - I work on freq in area 137.750 only for UA4-9-0 - analogue European
137.700 but for UA As, and I listen on the 800m BOG directed to Asia (NE)
For me there was by the large surprise a large difference (more 40dB)
between aerials on DCF39 - on 800m BOG (NE) abt S4-5 and on 2km BOG to Europe
(NW) abt S9+20

sri - agn not RX EA1PX ;-((

TNX all for reports and efforts!

73! Ed RU6LA  http://136.73.ru

Attachment: la_aet29apr.jpg
Description: image/pjpeg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: RU6LA acty Apr 29-30, Ed Lesnichy <=