Hi John,
As you can see, it was second line lockup of your
WOLF 5 signals:
2006-03-21 23:14:13 >WOLF5 -r 8000 -f 577 -t
1.0 -w 0.0000 t: 48 f: 0.464 a:-1.0 dp:113.2 ci: 0
cj: 0 J61UVPL*1FBQ0B* ? t: 96 f:
0.464 a:-1.1 dp:111.5 ci: 6 cj:221 WOLF5 DE WD2XES - t: 192
f: 0.464 a:-1.0 dp:112.7 ci: 6 cj:221 WOLF5 DE WD2XES - t: 384 f:
0.464 pm: 3809 jm:518 q: 3.2 3.3 WOLF5 DE WD2XES -
73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL Solar and wind
powered EN93dr
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:32
PM
Subject: LF: XES WOLF 5 Tonight
We speculated last year that the slower variations of WOLF
might have better static-crash immunity, so it's time for some tests. XES
will run WOLF at the 5 b/s rate tonight on 137.577 kHz, starting around
2330 UTC. Reports are welcome.
John Andrews,
W1TAG/WD2XES
|