To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: TA Feb, 17/18th |
From: | Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:36:28 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:39:48 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <021820061259.12521.43F71A300002F645000030E922007614380B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> |
References: | <021820061259.12521.43F71A300002F645000030E922007614380B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Warren, Did you record a .wav file? I was wondering if you heard my cw from around 05:35-05:40 UTC. yes, I did. The first of the 3 CW periods was the best and a capture is attached. I'm not sure if I use the correct speed for the capture, but a faster speed gave no results. If my speed was correct there is a copy of a "X" in that capture. I thing some more CW IDs in a row will bring better results. For listening the SNR is to low. 73 Hartmut |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: com port, MIKE REID |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Slow PSK result, MarkusVester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: TA Feb, 17/18th, Joe Craig |
Next by Thread: | LF: com port, hamilton mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |