|
Mal
Okay on the QRSS10. You may want to move frequency
a bit to get away from CT1DRP since the QRSS10 screen puts you nearly on top of
him.
Will blow the cobwebs out of the HF stuff this
weekend so we can give the crossband QSO a try. If condx remain good
it shouldn't be much of a challange.
Jay
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:20
AM
Subject: LF: Re: TA 05 Jan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>
To:
<[email protected]>
Sent:
Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: LF: TA 05 Jan
>
Much less static and good signal levels...details and captures
here:
>
> http://www.w1vd.com/gallery2006.html
>
>
Jay, W1VD
Hi Jay
Your recent captures look encouraging especially since
I was transmitting at
the higher speeds. Last night I was using QRS10,
unfortunately I switched
off too early, just when you hit the right button
hi
My normal speed will be qrs 10 or 20 which is more realistic for a
potential
qso. We all know from experience over the past few years that qrs
60 and 120
works but it takes too long. I have worked John/VE1JG at qrs 2
in the past
so the faster speeds are possible, in fact with better than
average
propagation TR signals would probably be audible.
I am trying to
be progressive here and move away from the qrs 60/120 beacon
mode night
after night that some others prefer.
I also work 7030 khz cw for feedback
at the same time as I am txing on LF.
Call me on there if you can and give
me a report, calls also welcome from
anyone that copies my LF
signals.
73 and tnx again for your effort and shots.
de
Mal/G3KEV
|
