Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: Re: TM5AST

from [F6CWN] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: TM5AST
From: "F6CWN" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:32:23 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:32:25 +0100
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <001b01c572a6$ea0d3980$0ce4fc3e@l8p8y6>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
21./06/2005   2023z
 
Hi Mal and the list,
 
The correct call (in 2005) was TM 5 AST
 We made a mistake at the beginning of the transmission,
(memory problem with QRSS  software and >30°C temperature!)...sorry!
We hope to be better operators in the next time.
 
73: Jeff / F6CWN
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PM
Subject: LF: TM0AST

Hi All
The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST. Which is correct ??
de G3KEV
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: RE: TA June, 21, Dave G3WCB
Next by Date:  LF: LORAN Rugby testing again, MarkusVester
Previous by Thread:  LF: TM0AST, hamilton mal
Next by Thread:  LF: TM0AST, hamilton mal
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]