To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests |
From: | "Dave Pick" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:41 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:31 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <000401c54b2c$f8d0e0d0$4d01a8c0@JKA> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcVLK2y+PAjkPbWIReymR462CEP2wgAFZjIg |
John and co.I'll run it overnight on 137.422 then at 300W or so. Let's hope conditions are still OK Dave G3YXM -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Andrews Sent: 27 April 2005 14:28 To: [email protected] Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests Dave, I'm willing to give it a try. What frequency would be good for you? The 137.441 kHz frequency has generally worked well on both sides, though I chose it more for EU than North American reasons. 137.422 kHz is clear of Loran-C over a lot of the U.S., and might be the best choice for a TA experiment. John Andrews |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WOLF Again, Hartmut Wolff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Wolf tests, Wolf DL4YHF |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | LF: <more> Wolf tests, Dave G3WCB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |