RE: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	RE: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18
From:	"Dave Pick" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:42:56 +0100
Delivery-date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:43:03 +0100
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
In-reply-to:	<001c01c543ff$cc864440$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AcVD/7wD+1sGwpwpTZ+z0CFVL0dCGwAA1RPg

Oh dear Jay..

This message tripped the Spam filter at my ISP (note the [SPAM] in the subject line). First time I've had it do that on a reflector posting maybe the subject line is too esoteric for it?

Dave G3YXM.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Rusgrove
Sent: 18 April 2005 11:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18

Similar results to the previous night. DRP M copy from 0030 - 0230Z, solid O copy thereafter through fadeout at 0630Z. Slight traces of WX.

Jay, W1VD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove RE: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Dave Pick <= Re: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove

Previous by Date:	[-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove
Next by Date:	Re: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove
Previous by Thread:	[-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove
Next by Thread:	Re: [-SPAM-] LF: TA APR 17/18, Jay Rusgrove
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]