Re: LF: Slower WOLF?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Slower WOLF? - Correction
From:	[email protected]
Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:20:01 EDT
Delivery-date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:20:44 +0100
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

...sorry, my previous statement was incorrect: the problem is that the transmit buffer overflows at -r > 10900. When I generated a wolfx.wav at original speed and slowed it to fourfold duration in the audio player, I could receive it alright at -r 32000.

Markus

In einer eMail vom 18.04.2005 01:23:00 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]:

Hi Stewart and Wolfgang,

thought I'd try to cheat WOLF into slower operation by faking samplerates, e.g. -r 80000 -f 22100 gives 2210 Hz audio at 1 bit/second. Looks fine on TX, ...

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: Slower WOLF? - Correction, MarkusVester <=

Previous by Date:	LF: Slower WOLF?, MarkusVester
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Graphic user interface for WOLF, Alberto di Bene
Previous by Thread:	LF: Slower WOLF?, MarkusVester
Next by Thread:	LF: XDW on "Alien space invader mode", Laurence KL1X
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Slower WOLF? - Correction