| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Another weak sig |
| From: | [email protected] |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:05:58 EDT |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Dear Bob and Teo, you did it again: http://members.aol.com/df6nm2/Eu-zl2ca_7Apr05_overlay.gif (74kB, 30s/10.5mHz). Bob received the first "AR" at 16:50...17:13, and then 18:12...18:22, near the end of the capture. Apparently the path was already open when Teo started transmitting. In the overlayed image I can vaguely see a few brighter noise pixels during Laurie's "Q" at 19:04...19:11, which would have been inconspicuous in the Argo capture alone. And good luck for tomorrow's eclipse experiment - see also DF3LP's 75-kHz observation on 11 Aug 1999: http://www.qsl.net/df3lp/projects/eclipse/index.html 73 de Markus, DF6NM In einer eMail vom 07.04.2005 22:17:22 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]: Hi all, |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re.LF:eclipse & EU sigs., Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re2: LF: Another weak sig, MarkusVester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re.LF:eclipse & EU sigs., Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Another weak sig, Vernall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |