Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re[2]: [LW] Which is Better?

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re[2]: [LW] Which is Better?
From: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:50 +0000
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Depending on the particular topic, it might also be worth while posting it to 
[email protected], which deals principally with 137kHz, including 
transatlantic and transpacific communications.

John Rabson G3PAI
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 30/01/2005 at 14:29 John Andrews wrote:

David,

If I'd like a post to be read by the wider lowfer community,
would it be best to post it to the reflector, or
to the message board on lwca.org?

It wouldn't hurt to do both. The LWCA Message Board is read by Lowfers and
by folks who have interests in NDB chasing, VLF monitoring, etc. The Lowfer
reflector is specifically aimed at the 137 kHz and 160-190 kHz crowd. But
there is no reason not to post Lowfer-related news in both locations.

I have read your posts on the Message Board regarding the SSB modules, and
am curious about their frequency stability.

John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES




________________________________________
File attachments, if any, have NOT been virus scanned...check before
opening!
To subscribe, unsubscribe or get other help, see http://lwca.org/groups.htm






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: Re[2]: [LW] Which is Better?, John Rabson <=