Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx is this a gap? from DK 8 N

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx is this a gap? from DK 8 ND
From: "Hans-Albrecht Haffa" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:06:01 +0100
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear Mal, yes, it is better to have a gap, but it may be very small, so just an gap of a layer of insulating tape or a layer of varnish. Just to keep low the remanent flux of the core. Do not use carbonyle iron cores (powder cores) or gapped ferrites with a gap of about 1 % of magnetic path length. Use a deflection transformer, the magnetic material is best for 136 k. Its better than a 62 mm toroid without any gap. 55, Hans- Albrecht DK 8 ND



[email protected] schrieb am 27.12.04 16:00:07:


----- Original Message -----
From: "Hans-Albrecht Haffa" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 8:34 PM
Subject: LF: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx is this a gap?


> Hello Lowfers,
> yes it is a gap. A residuous gap of two core halves with lapped surfaces
is still a gap. It will reduce relative permeability and remanent flux. It
is better to use core halves with a bit greater gapmade of a layer of
insulating tape  (0,05 mm thickness ) on both  sides of a core half.
Lowering remanent flux from 180 mt (ungapped ring core) to about 30 mT
gapped will rise magnetic swing in mMilli-Tesla. Thats what counts.  If You

take out the spacers of a deflection transformer, You get agood core for a
forward converter SMPS or a 136 kHz PA.

Hi Hans
If I understand you correctly, it is better to have a gap for a 136 khz PA.


de Mal/G3KEV

>
> 55, Hans-Albrecht
> DK 8 ND
>
>
> [email protected] schrieb am 24.12.04 10:55:28:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "james moritz" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 11:31 AM
> > Subject: LF: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx
> >
> >
> > Dear Gary, LF Group,
> >
> > You need one without an air gap - the air gap will drastically reduce
the
> > winding inductance, unfortunately.
> >
> > Hi All
> > I have used these cores and noticed no difference between them and a
> > continuous type core. I put the two core halves together tightly and
used
> > the same number of turns as used on the continuous core, maybe I was
lucky.
> > What does Jim call a gap? If they are tight together is that considered
a
> > gap? Must the core be totally continuous?
> > de Mal/G3KEV
> >
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
> Jetzt neu bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021193
>
>




________________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt neu bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021193



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: LF: Re: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx is this a gap? from DK 8 ND, Hans-Albrecht Haffa <=