To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically" |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:58:49 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: That's why the PVS proponents firmly refuse to carry scientifically controlled experimentsIt seems funy EH-"antenna" realy works. But surface curent of a coax realy radiate, not "antenna" itself :-) Certanly it is not better then siple pice of wire :-) with a zero-length feed line... Read the x-field yahoo group for details. All "theorys" about "crossed fields" is a nonsence of cose... Yes, I forgot to mention Poynting as another "grave-spinner".... :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: re LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically", G4gvw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: re LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically", WarmSpgs |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically", Alexander S. Yurkov |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically", Andy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |