Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Path length

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Path length
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:08:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3>
References: <000c01c420a4$e0c5c7c0$33e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <004001c42268$865e80e0$2102000a@ibm> <[email protected]> <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2-cvs
2.4km : that's 1.1 wavelength

Rik

Hi all,

Andrew ZL2BBJ and myself both live in Wellington, so it is of
interest to
work out who has the longer path length to RN6BN.  It is of course
the short
path.  A detailed check for differential path length, using a
1:50,000 scale
map, finds that ZL2BBJ is some 2.4 km further from RN6BN than ZL2CA. So not
much in it, but for record claiming purposes Andrew has the longer
path.

I am suppressing a desire to relocate to the eastern suburbs ;-)

73, Bob ZL2CA









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>