To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Path length |
From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:08:51 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> |
References: | <000c01c420a4$e0c5c7c0$33e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <004001c42268$865e80e0$2102000a@ibm> <[email protected]> <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2-cvs |
2.4km : that's 1.1 wavelength Rik Hi all, Andrew ZL2BBJ and myself both live in Wellington, so it is of interest to work out who has the longer path length to RN6BN. It is of course the short path. A detailed check for differential path length, using a 1:50,000 scalemap, finds that ZL2BBJ is some 2.4 km further from RN6BN than ZL2CA. So notmuch in it, but for record claiming purposes Andrew has the longer path. I am suppressing a desire to relocate to the eastern suburbs ;-) 73, Bob ZL2CA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Path length, captbrian |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: RN6BN, hamilton mal |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RN6BN O with 20 second dot, Vernall |
Next by Thread: | LF: WD2XES on tonight, John Andrews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |