Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: CT<>ZL |
| From: | [email protected] |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:51:29 EDT |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Dear LF group, late again, but nevertheless - congratulations to Ed's group, Sam, Mike and Bob on their fantastic LF DX results! Marek and Brian, - on the other hand, there might be some sort of focussing gain on an antipode path. There was an interesting paper on ELF propagation (ie. 76 and 82Hz) by P. Bannister and A. Fraser-Smith, showing a formula and a couple of measured data points confirming that: http://www-star.stanford.edu/~acfs/82Hz.pdf Of course the situation may be very different for our "short" LF waves, which would be less likely to stay in coherence over such distances. But then again, observing the NCDXF beacon network on 14100 kHz a few years ago, I found much more consistent reception of ZL6B around the day, compared to closer ones like VK6 and KH6 which were rather erratic. 73 de Markus, DF6NM In einer eMail vom 13.04.2004 19:45:38 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [email protected]: If a significant dark path is necessary as it would appear from the recently reported captures of DCF39 in New Zealand, I postulate that it is not possible under "normal" conditions to achieve longwave communication over the ~20,000km. However all is not lost as previous experience with 160m showed that sporadic but very infrequent communication was possible over this path and at signal strengths that need some explaining. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: M copy of RN6BN, Vernall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: RN6BN, F6CWN |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: CT<>ZL, Brian Rogerson |
| Next by Thread: | LF: LF Propagation, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |