Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Re: WOLF development

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: WOLF development
From: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:33:43 -0800
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi Alan,

First, my apologies for taking so long to answer.

Second, my apologies for not understanding what you meant by
'keyed oscillator'.

I think that the LC oscillator has to be quite stable, unless
there is a good way to see and compensate the drift in software.
Suppose that the oscillator is gated on for 100 milliseconds,
and the software just averages the beat phase over that interval.
Then a 5 Hz oscillator offset would result in a 90 degree error
in the reference.  If the gate is on for only a few milliseconds,
that effect is minimized, but then the beep isn't much better
than what you get by feeding the 1 pps directly to the antenna input.

I once modified an RX for external locking, by using a PLL to
generate the same frequency as its reference crystal, and
injection locking via a gimmick wire glued to the RX PCB.
The good news is that the receiver would then still work with
the external box disconnected.  The bad news is that not all
LO frequencies came from this reference, so the stability was
improved, but still quite imperfect.

73,

Stewart


----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 2:41 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: WOLF development


Hi Stewart,.......answer below...sent direct
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 25 February 2004 07:42
Subject: LF: Re: WOLF development


> Your keyed oscillator idea is interesting, but it appears to
> introduce another unknown.  For example, if the 136 kHz oscillator
> drifted up 0.01 Hz, it would affect the audio in the same way
> as the receiver LO drifting down 0.01 Hz.  One way to resolve
> this ambiguity would be to digitally divide the 136 kHz into
> the audio range, and feed that into the sound card, too.
> Do you have a simpler solution?
>
I suspect you have "forgotten" the properties of a keyed oscillator in this
application. If the 136khz oscillator is stopped and re-started by the 1pps
signal it will lock and not drift. I agree that if just the oscillator
output is keyed  (so the whole comb drifts as well) then the osc drift will
be a variable, but the keyed oscillator becomes a locked comb-generator.
(Tube technology revisited !!) Thus it should be possible to construct this
as an LC oscillator. I have not done the maths but I suspect that the
smallscale sawtooth FSK created by the drift during the interval between
locking pulses will "spread" the line a little, but averaging should be able
to remove this satisfactorily.

My LF RXs (AOR 7030 s ) whilst stable (TCXO), have no facility to feed in an
external standard. The TCXO is a "funny frequency" too.

Fascinating stuff.
Cheers de Alan G3NYK
[email protected]








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: Re: Re: Re: WOLF development, Stewart Nelson <=