To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Still no luck at ZL6QH |
From: | "Vernall" <vernall@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:49:13 +1200 |
References: | <003401c2eadb$25816690$1b00a8c0@dellboy> <002101c2eafa$7f6d7a80$0500a8c0@charter.net> <002801c2eafe$9e55a180$6211f4cc@jsm> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> |
Hi all, Still no luck for ZL6QH. At one stage we got very good copy of the latter part of an "NN" which assume came from UA9OC, but as they could not copy us, and we had no confirmed identification of the sender. We happened to be at the end of transmitting from ZL6QH when we believe the first character of "NN" was sent, around 1430 UTC, so by the time we we had changed over to receive, all we got was "dit dah-dit" in QRSS60, with O grade of copy. So we think that LF DX propagation was favourable, but there were no bites on the other end of our fishing line ..... ah well. For listeners to the earlier QQQQ beacon from ZL6QH, I can confirm we made a continuous transmission. 73, Bob ZL2CA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: UA9OC QTH, Alexander S. Yurkov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: ZL6QH tests, Vernall |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: ZL6QH tests, Steve McDonald |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: ZL6QH tests, Jay Rusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |