Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: R: Re: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: R: Re: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac
From: "PC" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:19:29 -0500
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Cesare,

Thank for the information on the proximity effect.  It looks likes that the
spacing between conductors needs to be quite a bit less than I was
estimating.  This makes building the antenna significantly easier than first
thought.

After searching the web I found nothing at all relating to the calculations
needed to determine spacing.
Also very impressive webpage you have.  Thank you for having an English
version.

Thank you again
Paulc
W1VLF
----- Original Message -----
From: "cesare tagliabue" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: LF: R: Re: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac


Hello Johan
    I've used SQR as square root, as is usual in Basic language, sorry !
73 Cesare

Cesare Tagliabue   I 5 TGC
WW-Loc  JN53PS
e-mail: [email protected]
url: http://www.dadacasa.com/i5tgc

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
A: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Data: lunedì 18 marzo 2002 11.45
Oggetto: LF: Re: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac


Cesare Tagliabue wrote:

>  Reff / Rrf = 1 + (q - 1) * SQR (( p - 1 ) / p )

This info is interesting!

Question: Is SQR "squared" or "square root" ?

In some programming languages SQR (X) = X^0.5, in others
SQR (X) = X^2 while SQRT (X) = X^0.5...

73
Johan SM6LKM








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>