Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September) |
| From: | "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:44:06 -0400 |
| References: | <965803.997454577531.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp01> <000301c121de$e47f7860$7cb21bca@xtr743187> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Bob: Looking further ahead, if we can get our permits amended to transmit around 136 kHz, are there any suggestions as to what spot frequencies are suitable? Respectfully request you avoid 136.6 to 137.4, which is occupied by CFH + sideband noise when they are on. If you come above about 136.1, I will have to stop transmitting while I listen. NPG, I think in California was a major signal some time back, early 2000, I do not remember the frequency. Larry VA3LK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September), Vernall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Picture of ZL band in EU, Brian Rogerson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: LF: ZL DX testing 21 September (was 22 September), Vernall |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Picture of ZL band in EU, Brian Rogerson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |