Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: re Steve

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: re Steve
From: "John Sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 09:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi Alan,
I think you have struck the nail on the head Alan.
Current in = Current out is probably only true if the coil is very short, i.e. 
this is just an approximation to the truth, which breaks down when the coil is 
large.

If there were no wire attached to the top, current in would certainly not equal 
current out, so why should a bit of wire stuck on the top make a lot of 
difference? The coil would then become a helical antenna and would probably 
need a lot of capacitance to bring it to resonance.

73 John, G4CNN


-----Original Message-----
From: "Alan Melia"<[email protected]>
To: "LF-Group"<[email protected]>
Date: Mon May 07 16:41:29 PDT 2001
Subject: LF: re Steve's RF currents

Hi all, It occurs to me that Steve's aerials is just 12m up....no top load,>so 
there will be a considerable taper in the current from top to
bottom....not like the heavily top-loaded 'T's and 'L's which are supposed
to have almost constant current in the vertical. Might this difference in
current be just what might be expected in that situation....I think the coil
has to be regarded as part of the aerial. If you assume a linear taper in
current that accounts for about 200mA just by the length of the coil (app.
1m) or its height above ground. Maybe that a bit naive, but then if the
other was losses, that would account for the 400mA.

Fascinating....I am learning a lot.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK
[email protected]




___________________________________________________
GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: LF: re Steve, John Sexton <=