Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Dual speed CW....

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Dual speed CW....
From: "Paul A. Cianciolo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:19:02 -0500
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hello Alan,

I did get a  good laugh from the last line in your email!!!

I think it would be simpler to send 2 speeds CW  but the proper packaging
of characters
would satify both users at one time.  I also agree that it would not be as
effective as
QRSS because of the keying and sidebands but I have been able to see traces
on spectran
of say 6 WPM when I could not copy it by ear,,..   In this case a character
can be seen, certainly it woould be
different than the 6 WPM ID.  Just a thought

Thanks for the response Alan.

BTW my kids want you to say hello to Santa if you see him since he will
visit your
part of the world before ours!!

Merry Christmas


Cloudbounce Webpage
Rescue Electronic Surplus

1982 Vanagon Diesel  Turbo Diesel 1.9
GE Electrak E20 and E15  electric tractors
First place in local tractor pulls  at 1750 LBS
With Stock E-20 Electric tractor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 18:48 PM
Subject: LF: Dual speed CW....

Hi Paul, wouldn't it be simpler for the beacon to send alternate 10wpm and
QRSS calls?? the problem is that QRSS is only required when you CAN'T hear
the signal. If you don't transmit solid QRSS dots and dashes you are
throwing away some of the theoretical advantage of being able to integrate
the power in a narrow bandwidth. Personally after listening to it for a
couple of years I find I can read 3 sec dot QRSS by ear....certainly 2
character calls.... Mind you it may be an effect of encroaching

Happy Christmas de Alan G3NYK
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>