Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: QRSS vs. BPSK, etc.

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: QRSS vs. BPSK, etc.
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 13:52:22 +0000
Organization: University of Hertfordshire
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Dear LF Group,
I'm sure that modes such as BPSK have considerable technical advantages compared to the slow CW modes. But as in most areas of engineering, technical excellence is not the only factor.

The advantages of QRSS include the following:

- It is very easy to modify an existing CW station for QRSS operation - all that is required are some simple keying circuits and leads, and a rather basic PC with some free software.

-QRSS is not demanding on the transmitter/receiver. The duty cycle is much the same as normal CW, any transmitter capable of on-off keying can be used, all that is required of the receiver is an audio output. Exceptional frequency stability is not required.

-There are no synchronisation or clock recovery issues with QRSS; also, the PC spectrogram display effectively 'decodes' all the signals present in a relatively wide bandwidth. These things make random QSO's straightforwards - there is no need to know the exact frequency a station is using, the time it will be operating, or even to know the exact modulation method that will be used.

In summary, slow CW may not give the very best results, or be a particularly satisfying intellectual challenge, but it does give rather good results with simple equipment.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: QRSS vs. BPSK, etc., James Moritz <=