Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: SV: Re: Re: LF - early April 1st question / QRU

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: SV: Re: Re: LF - early April 1st question / QRU
From: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:44:58 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Yes Roger, you are right and I agree.

I guess the CFA was an attempt to produce a "ready made"
flying far field already in the antenna structure.

G3JKV was right too. Please let us stop this discussion before
more internet bandwidth is wasted. Such a discussion will not
lead anywhere because of the laws of nature.

It was stupid of me to enter the thread. I apologize.

73 de Johan Bodin, SM6LKM


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Prof R. Jennison <[email protected]>
Till: INTERNET:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Datum: den 22 mars 1999 00:18
Ämne: LF: Re: Re: LF - early April 1st question


It is not essential to produce Both the E and H fields.  Either one can
produce the other.  For example the toroidal antenna launches only an E
field with an associated vector potential that produce, in the far field,
an H field to accompany the E field.  Similarly a loop antenna launches
only an H field with its associated vector potential and as a result the E
field forms in the far field.  In both cases one ends up with a complete
propagating electromagnetic field.
With respect, take a look at the curl of the vectors. Roger, G2AJV.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: SV: Re: Re: LF - early April 1st question / QRU, Johan Bodin <=