Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+EbNaut\s+8270\.1\,\s+Thursday\s+Mar\s+10\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:22:50 -0500
Another EbNaut message for Stefan has just been started at 09:20: Frequency: 8270.100 Hz, start time 09:20:02, 5 characters, 8K19A, 16 bit CRC, 10 second symbols, total duration 5120 seconds, end tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00133.html (10,789 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:48:00 +0100
All looks good, antenna current stable at 0.34 A. The message will be repeated 13:00:02 to 14:25:22 73, Markus From: Markus Vester Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:22 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00136.html (12,446 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:05:47 +0100
Between the two EbNaut sequences (10:45 to 13 UT), I had sent a straight uninterrupted carrier on 8270.0025 Hz. This looked clean on my own monitor (which is referenced to the same GPS as the TX), bu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00140.html (14,168 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:24:58 +0000
An easy decode Eb/N0 = 1.7 dB, BER 34.2% and the phase pattern was -30 -30 0 0. Carrier -55.8dB in 2.5kHz after sferic blanking. Decoded with Eb/N0 = 0.0 dB, BER 36.9%, phase -30 -30 0 0, carrier -56
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00147.html (11,095 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:54:12 +0100
Hello Markus, Thanks for your transmission. Unfortunately i got no copy in both messages. The QRN levels were quite high :-( Your carriers were visible, with lower SNR though. Maybe a receive loop wo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00153.html (13,205 bytes)

6. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:18:53 +0100
Thanks a lot Paul, it's good to see your reliable decodes. The carrier data is helpful, and we can see that some irregularity must have occured before 12 UT. Interestingly my Loran-C monitor, which i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00157.html (14,162 bytes)

7. RE: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:30:32 -0500
Paul and Markus, Nice work! Given the good phase SNR I looked for X-ray events correlated with the phase bump at ~ 11:15. There was a ~ C1 event at about 10:20, which I'm guessing is ruled out by the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00159.html (13,045 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 21:05:31 +0100
Thanks for the hint Jim! Hoping to be able to blame Mother Nature rather than my own transmitter, I inspected several MSK traces in DF3LP's valuable archive http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/fh/show_wf.cgi?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00175.html (15,340 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Thursday Mar 10 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 02:15:11 +0000
There was a small wobble of the DHO phase at about that time - about 3 degrees peak at 10:24 - and it didn't last long. Except for that there were no other disturbances. A pity really, that might hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00187.html (10,846 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu