Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8269\.997\s+Hz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8269\.997\s+Hz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: 8269.997 Hz (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC); Looks like Riccardo is sending a carrier on 8269.997 today. Good luck, Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]> An: LF Group <[email protected]> Ve; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-02/msg00209.html (11,066 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 8269.997 Hz (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:10:43 +0100; Markus, VLF Yes, indeed: with DL0AO and Stefan's RDF there are no doubt :-) Yesterday the carrier was produced feeding my antenna with about 650mA but I think the noise was too high to attempt an EbN; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-02/msg00215.html (12,928 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: 8269.997 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:10:32 +0100; Hello Riccardo, Thank you for the transmission in daylight. It was interesting to compare the different antennas. I analysed just two hours centered at 12 UTC and looked on all 3 antennas separately.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-02/msg00226.html (11,235 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]