Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8\.275\s+kHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8\.275\s+kHz\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:21:40 +0100; Paul Nicholson put forth the important argument that we'd better stay away from 8280 because it's a multiple of 60 Hz. Mains harmonics tend to drift a bit with the line frequeny so further away is be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00015.html (10,979 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:11 +0100; Peter, ok. But I still have a problem with the railway QRM on 8270, so I'd prefer either 8275 or 8280... What do the others think? Chris, Eddie, Gerhard, Haldór, Jim, Laurence, Lubos, Paul, Stefan ?; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00806.html (21,313 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:08:59 +0100; QRM here on 8280. Prefer 8275 PA1SDB -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Markus Vester To: [email protected] [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Paul S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00807.html (22,290 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:36:32 +0000; On 03/01/2014 11:10, Markus Vester wrote: Peter, ok. But I still have a problem with the railway QRM on 8270, so I'd prefer either 8275 or 8280... What do the others think? Chris, Eddie, Gerhard, H; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00808.html (10,864 bytes)
5. VLF: 8.275 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:43:48 +0100; Hi Uwe, ok, but could you make that 8275 Hz? PA1SDB seems to be bothered by a continuous line on 8270 and some noise on 8280. I also have significantly more QRM around 8270. 8275 Hz is clearer, and I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00826.html (18,362 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]