Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+17\s+km\s+experiment\s+on\s+the\s+101\s+km\s+band\s+\-\s+3\/3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+17\s+km\s+experiment\s+on\s+the\s+101\s+km\s+band\s+\-\s+3\/3\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ULF: 17 km experiment on the 101 km band - 3/3 (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:52:35 -0400; Hi Stefan, the spectrograms from your far-field recording are now showing a very clear trace on 2970.0025 Hz. Congratulations! I wonder why the postprocessing analysis takes so long. Apparently SpecL; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00015.html (17,127 bytes)
2. Re: ULF: 17 km experiment on the 101 km band - 3/3 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:05:26 +0200; Hi Markus, Thanks. The signal has a low SNR but is there clearly. About 50% of the data is passed now. The second half should be more clear. Let's wait until tomorrow to summarize the whole results.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00016.html (18,232 bytes)
3. Re: ULF: 17 km experiment on the 101 km band - 3/3 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:23:26 +1000; Hi Stefan, You could use SOX software http://sox.sourceforge.net/ (command line in a batch file) or Audacity software http://www.audacityteam.org/ (windows) to combine the audio files. Regards, Edgar; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00017.html (10,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]