Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+LF\:\s+Dummy\s+load\s+testing\s+without\s+LPF\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+LF\:\s+Dummy\s+load\s+testing\s+without\s+LPF\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: R: LF: Dummy load testing without LPF? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:55:04 +0100; Hello Jay, Thanks for your and the other replies. Testing shows this is exactly the case and I have learnt something else with this, appreciated! -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00359.html (10,014 bytes)
2. Re: R: LF: Dummy load testing without LPF? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:12:47 +0100; Hello Dr.Wolf, 24 April 2017 Thanks for the reply Wolf, I tested with no LPF and the output transformer got pretty hot. With the rebuilt LPF all was fine. So I now have two reliable, identical amps.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00372.html (10,373 bytes)
3. Re: R: LF: Dummy load testing without LPF? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:13:44 +0100; Hello Jay, Yes, this is what I found, I'm learning, slowly and appreciate the explanation, all the best. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00373.html (10,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]