Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+wspr15\s+decodes\s+on\s+136kHz\s+last\s+night\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+wspr15\s+decodes\s+on\s+136kHz\s+last\s+night\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: wspr15 decodes on 136kHz last night (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:45:16 +0100; Hartmut, Maybe it has to do with your "callsign" DL-SWL. In the past i've read about similar problems. Try to use a real callsign like DE0TST, for a single upload test (is this already illegal?) If t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00073.html (9,502 bytes)
2. LF: wspr15 decodes on 136kHz last night (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:35:14 +0100; I still have problems with the upload to wsprnet. Here is what I decoded last night: 2130 -31 -0.2 0.137605 0 UA0AET NO65 37 2215 -26 0.8 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20 2330 -28 0.8 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00304.html (8,386 bytes)
3. Re: LF: wspr15 decodes on 136kHz last night (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:46:31 +0100; Stefan, thanks for the reply, The upload is ok with wspr, but since I updated wsprx to v0.7r2948 the upload didn't work with wspr15. I'll make some tests tomorrow. Hartmut Am 2013-03-09 14:45, schrie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00542.html (9,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]