Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+vertical\/loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+vertical\/loop\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: vertical/loop (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:06:47 +0100; Hi Mal, The facts are being distorted because of local environmental issues instead of comparing the two antennas on LF where both systems are small physically compared to the frequency. Only those w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00133.html (9,460 bytes)
2. Re: LF: vertical/loop (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:19:16 +0000 (GMT); Hi Mal and Group. and have found the vertical a lot better and easier to tame, easy to match using a series inductor and tuned against an insulated ground radial system to match 50 ohms, and manageab; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00163.html (9,546 bytes)
3. LF: vertical/loop (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:51:05 +0100; Hi All My argument is that a vertical antenna has the advantage over a loop at the same height out in the open ie the middle of a field. Some others are discussing environmental issues like verticals; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00164.html (9,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]