Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+valid\s+QSO\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+valid\s+QSO\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: valid QSO or not ? (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:56:44 EST; << Maybe now the moment has come that the committee of the 'Peter Bobek Award' takes a clear desicion under what circumstances a QSO on 136kHz is valid (for the award). >> Hi All, but in particular L; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00164.html (8,362 bytes)
2. LF: valid QSO or not ? (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:35:43; Maybe now the moment has come that the committee of the 'Peter Bobek Award' takes a clear desicion under what circumstances a QSO on 136kHz is valid (for the award). I believe that the 3 societies in; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00167.html (11,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]