Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+more\s+loop\s+inductance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+more\s+loop\s+inductance\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: more loop inductance (score: 1): Author: "Brian Rogerson" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:39:14 +0100; Hi Rik, L = 0.4*(A+B)*(ln((A+B)/d)+7.6-0.35*(A+B)^2/(A*B)) where L = loop inductance in uH, A = loop height in m, B = loop length in m and d = wire diameter in mm The formula would be valid for loops; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00190.html (10,040 bytes)
2. LF: more loop inductance (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:24:00; Having a closer look at the formulas for different loop shapes gives an indication that there is a correlation between the inductance of a loop and the ratio of perimeter^2/area. If this is correct i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00194.html (9,320 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]