Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+more\s+acurate\s+formula\s+for\s+ground\s+loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+more\s+acurate\s+formula\s+for\s+ground\s+loss\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: more acurate formula for ground loss (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 10:35:38 +0000 (GMT); Hi John and Group. Putting in the same antenna details as before, the new formula gives 38 ohms, still too low by a factor of over 2, but much better than with the first formula. May be 93 - 38 = 55; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00065.html (10,466 bytes)
2. Re: LF: more acurate formula for ground loss (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:38:26 +0000 (GMT); Hi John and Group! Hi Sasha, Putting in the same antenna details as before, the new formula gives 38 ohms, still too low by a factor of over 2, but much better than with the first formula. I just com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00074.html (9,730 bytes)
3. Re: LF: more acurate formula for ground loss (score: 1): Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 08:55:14 -0400 (EDT); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00075.html (8,171 bytes)
4. LF: more acurate formula for ground loss (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:34:15 +0000 (GMT); Hi, Group! I have derived more acurate formula for ground loss then previous one. This formula show previous formula is extremely aproximate. Factor of number units was losssed... New formula is deri; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00079.html (9,947 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]