Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+loop\s+v\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+loop\s+v\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: loop v vertical (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:42:03 -0500; He will come around yet. I run a vertical and a loop also. Both have their good points and bad points. http://www.we0h.us/lf --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:owne; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00053.html (8,809 bytes)
2. Re: LF: loop v vertical (score: 1): Author: "K.Versteeg" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:44:22 +0100; Mal Never thought i would see this line ! 73 Ko, NL9222; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00056.html (7,949 bytes)
3. LF: loop v vertical (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:12:15 +0100; There is a lot of QRN/rain static about today and the vertical is a lot better than the loop. I suppose its to do with the direction of the rain front. So a loop is not necessarily a quiet antenna an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00057.html (8,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]