Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPRX_08r3575\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:10:00 +0200
Hi MF/LF ! New WSPR-X from Joe K1JT : http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPRX_08r3575.exe 73 de dg3lv Tobias
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00249.html (9,340 bytes)

2. RE: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:07:53 -0500
Tobias, I have been working on cancellation of power-line noise and impulsive noise, so I was interested in your comment about W1JT's new blanker. By "SVN-server" do you mean developer.berlios.de ? (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00393.html (12,645 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:13:38 +0200
Hi Tobias, Thanks for the information and link. Where do you know it from? And is there any documentation regarding the new features? I cannot find them at http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ws
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00655.html (10,656 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:19:18 +0200
Hi Stefan/LF ! Information on the SVN-server says, that there was a noise blanker added. Hopefully Joe will publish some information on that. Regular visits on the SVN-server tells what Joe K1JT et.a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00656.html (11,201 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:40:55 +0200
Hi Stefan ! No, I did not test the blanker. My HDSDR program has two noiseblankers implemented (at HF and IF), they work very well. I'm waiting for some documentation on the new feature until I will/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00657.html (12,553 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:51:05 +0200
Am 04.10.2013 16:40, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: No station to test ? Use G0HNW for a test, he is constantly decoded here with -24 at noon, to now -28 (16:33h local), he is the unique signal on the band, n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00658.html (11,638 bytes)

7. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:47:18 +0200
Hi Tobias, Am 02.10.2013 16:19, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: Hi Stefan/LF ! Information on the SVN-server says, that there was a noise blanker added. Thanks for all the infos. Finally :-) During the time he
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00659.html (11,727 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:45:26 +0100
How did you measure the 2 dB Stefan ? Hi Tobias, Am 02.10.2013 16:19, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: Hi Stefan/LF ! Information on the SVN-server says, that there was a noise blanker added. Thanks for all the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00660.html (12,114 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:13:14 +0100
The software reported 2 dB change ? G 4X1RF and GW0EZY took a recording of my WSPR transmission and sent it to me via dropbox, a wav file recorded in SpecLab. I run the recordings in an endless loop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00661.html (13,733 bytes)

10. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:08:42 +0200
G 4X1RF and GW0EZY took a recording of my WSPR transmission and sent it to me via dropbox, a wav file recorded in SpecLab. I run the recordings in an endless loop and produced a set of decodes, 5 dec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00662.html (13,302 bytes)

11. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:43:57 +0200
Yes, CFM... Am 03.10.2013 21:13, schrieb Graham: The software reported 2 dB change ? G 4X1RF and GW0EZY took a recording of my WSPR transmission and sent it to me via dropbox, a wav file recorded in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00663.html (14,220 bytes)

12. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:53:25 +0200
Tobias, I've made a short test using the new version and the old simultaneously, using the same audio input. There are no decodes at all in the new version, with or without the SpecLab NB enabled. Th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00664.html (12,471 bytes)

13. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:57:24 +0200
Hi Stefan ! ??? It decodes as well as the previous version "3058". Decodes down to -33dB have been recorded here (mode WSPR-2). Maybe a problem with installation directory name? (NO "Spaces"!) BTW :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00665.html (12,686 bytes)

14. Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:00:25 +0200
Am 04.10.2013 12:57, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: [...] Maybe a problem with installation directory name? (NO "Spaces"!) Oh, yes, thanks. That was the reason. Now it works but in the moment i have no test s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00666.html (11,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu