Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+on\s+VLF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+on\s+VLF\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR on VLF (score: 1): Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:14:49 -0500; According to the pull down band menu on WSPRNET propagation map there is WSPR activity on VLF/LF: http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/map Vlf is below 30kHz, perhaps they are on 9kHz? -- 73 Warren K2OR; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00170.html (9,131 bytes)
2. Re: LF: WSPR on VLF (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:29:32 +0100; I guess they have their own interpretation of VLF, based on the calls i see it's 137kHz / 504kHz 73, Rik http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/map Vlf is below 30kHz, perhaps they are on 9kHz? -- 73 Warr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00205.html (9,019 bytes)
3. Re: LF: WSPR on VLF (score: 1): Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:35:48 -0500; After digging further into the WSPRNET map, I only saw 500kHz and one 137kHz station plotted. Apparently the organizers of WSPRNET do not know the difference between VLF, LF, and MF ! - 73 Warren K2O; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00216.html (10,514 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]