Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSJT\-X\s+1\.9\s+vs\s+1\.8\s+WSPR\s+decoding\s+test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSJT\-X\s+1\.9\s+vs\s+1\.8\s+WSPR\s+decoding\s+test\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSJT-X 1.9 vs 1.8 WSPR decoding test (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 07:57:51 -0500; Yesterday's release of WSJT-X 1.9.0rc2 came with this note: "Improved decoding performance for WSPR mode, especially effective at LF and MF". I wanted to put this to the test so overnight I ran four; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00475.html (11,228 bytes)
2. Re: LF: WSJT-X 1.9 vs 1.8 WSPR decoding test (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:18:31 +0100; Hello Paul, Thanks for the useful test and encouraging results. Very useful for the community. I will QSY to the new version due to your results. TNX, 73, Stefan Am 26.02.2018 13:57, schrieb N1BUG: Y; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00476.html (12,137 bytes)
3. Re: LF: WSJT-X 1.9 vs 1.8 WSPR decoding test (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:38:13 +0000; Hello Paul / Stefan, Ditto, I see what you were up to last night, have updated myself now, thanks! -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00477.html (9,367 bytes)
4. Re: LF: WSJT-X 1.9 vs 1.8 WSPR decoding test (score: 1): Author: Jan Damme <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:06:31 +0100; The new WSJTX 1.9 RC release candidate has a feature I like ..... Which means you can drive 472kHz pa with a normal TRX from 160m div 4! Basicly the GW3UEP PA with CD4049 divider will suffice. (In; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00481.html (12,767 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]