Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WOLF\s+Again\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WOLF\s+Again\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WOLF again (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:53:50 +0100; When I run WOLF under Win 98 for a split second I get a small black window (similar to running DOS) but it disappeared so fast I wasn't able to read it. By repeated running I found that I hadn't inc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00152.html (14,019 bytes)
2. LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:38:27 +0100; WD2XES is back on 137.441 kHz tonight, with WOLF at 200 watts. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES FN42ch WD2XES Status: http://www.w1tag.com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00311.html (8,988 bytes)
3. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:34:18 +0200; WD2XES is back on 137.441 kHz tonight, with WOLF at 200 watts. Best signal after 0300z. 73 Hartmut WOLF -q E:\Eigene Dateien\137\wav\Files\441\441-050424_25-0300.wav -r 11025 -f 791 -t 0.01 -w 0.0000; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00314.html (11,638 bytes)
4. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:56:39 -0400; Hartmut, Amazing. Anyone interested in a 15 watt run tonight? That would be 11 dB below normal. John Andrews; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00315.html (9,285 bytes)
5. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:56:52 +0200; John, I'm interested. The usual frequency? Hartmut Hartmut, Amazing. Anyone interested in a 15 watt run tonight? That would be 11 dB below normal. John Andrews; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00316.html (10,120 bytes)
6. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:16:24 -0400; Hartmut, I'm interested. The usual frequency? Yes, it seems to be pretty good on both sides. 137.441 kHz, 15 watt WOLF, starting around 2230 UTC. My local sunset is now at 2340 UTC. John Andrews; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00317.html (9,765 bytes)
7. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: Joe Craig <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:46:33 -0230 (NDT); Hartmut John and Group, Good luck with your attempt tonight! Having looked at the web page on WOLF that John recently provided, it seems this is a very interesting mode. Joe VO1NA Hartmut, Yes, it se; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00318.html (10,291 bytes)
8. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:58:36 +0100; Hi John, I will be "listening" again with the same params as last night which seemed quite successful. Cheers de Alan G3NYK Hartmut, Yes, it seems to be pretty good on both sides. 137.441 kHz, 15 wat; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00321.html (10,252 bytes)
9. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:31:22 -0400; Hi John, Stewart and LF, excellent signals from XGJ (0:30 to 4:30) and VO1NA (2:00 to 3:30, slightly weaker). However nil copy of the WOLF 15-watter from XES. Thanks to Stewart for the explanations o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00326.html (10,204 bytes)
10. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:59:04 -0400; Markus, Thanks for trying for the WOLF copy last night. Alan appears to have won the 15 watt prize, unless Hartmut manages to extract something from the noise! Given the vagaries of fading, and the e; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00327.html (10,145 bytes)
11. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:50:28 +0200; John, Thanks for trying for the WOLF copy last night. Alan appears to have won the 15 watt prize, unless Hartmut manages to extract something from the noise! Nil copy of the 15 watt signal. Will cont; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00328.html (10,371 bytes)
12. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:09:05 -0700; Hi Markus and all, Does that mean you have to do two million 960-point correlations per receive block to fill it? No, the complex baseband signal is "despread" in 960 positions by multiplying by the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00330.html (11,067 bytes)
13. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:47:58 +0200; XES will be back to 200 watts output tonight, with WOLF on 137.441 kHz, starting at 2230 UTC. Copied the WOLF transmission 2345-0300z. Captures also from VO1NA and WD2XGJ can be seen: http://www.h-wo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00341.html (10,474 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]