Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TA\s+6\s+FEB\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TA\s+6\s+FEB\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: TA 6 Feb (score: 1): Author: Joe Craig <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:27:18 -0330 (NST); Good sigs from SM6BHZ along with traces of 2-3 others. Much QRM from the mains. 73 Joe VO1NA; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00104.html (9,172 bytes)
2. LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 07:36:07 -0500; This capture was from early in the evening as qrm picked up overnight. Can't ID from what's there but RX setup is GPS disciplined so frequency is very accurate. Anyone care to claim this signal? Jay,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00105.html (8,194 bytes)
3. Re: LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:32:36 EST; Dear Jay and LF Group, well done, your capture looks very much like "bhz" from Gus. Between my dashes, the grabber recorded nighttime activity from five European stations around 135.922 kHz: 923.00 S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00106.html (8,735 bytes)
4. Re: LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:52:06 +0000; The same signal showed up here between 0315z and 0345Z. Nothing seen after that. Dex; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00107.html (8,880 bytes)
5. Re: LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:54:42 -0500; Markus Thanks for the info. I'll review last nights captures in more detail later today to see if I can glean any other bits and pieces based on your list. Nothing else stood out at first glance. Any; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00108.html (9,653 bytes)
6. Re: LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:28:08 +0100; 923.00 SM6BHZ 922.66 YU7AR 922.40 / .30 DF6NM 921.60 unid northwesterly, maybe G? 921.0 / 920.5 PA0SE (drifting down by ~0.3Hz later) The G? was probably me, transmitting on 135921.25kHz. Mike, G3XDV; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00110.html (8,577 bytes)
7. Re: LF: TA 6 FEB (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:32:38 +0100; It seems the opposite direction worked much better. Excellent signals from WD2XES and WD2XGJ last night. Some fading between 0300-0430z but than again strong signals. The attached screenshot shows 00; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00111.html (8,845 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]