Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Spectrogram\s+dot\s+length\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Spectrogram\s+dot\s+length\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Spectrogram dot length (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:41:10 +0100; In bench tests it has been claimed that there is no advantage in going for a dot length exceeding 3 or 4 seconds when using QRSS and Spectrogram. During a QRSs QSO this weekend with DJ5BV, local inte; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00059.html (9,828 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Spectrogram dot length (score: 1): Author: "Peter W. Schnoor" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 20:12:21 +0200; Hello Group, Hi Mike, [...] This makes two points: 1) What a good idea it was to have reports using just dashes. That's what I suggested some month ago: *Four* dashes for indicating "just audible". 2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00062.html (9,646 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Spectrogram dot length (score: 1): Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 20:10:43 +0100; This makes two points: 1) What a good idea it was to have reports using just dashes. The idea originates frome the EME community. They use this system since 20 years or so ... and face signal condit; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00063.html (9,940 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Spectrogram dot length (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:09:49 +0100; I'm preferring CU (*SEE* YOU) since that's what has happened or should be... 54°16'N / 10°04'E, JO54ag 73 es gl de Peter, DF3LP Yes, of course. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00065.html (9,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]