Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Sorry\s+no\s+Cluster\s+spots\s+for\s+June\s+10\/11\s+from\s+GB7DXM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Sorry\s+no\s+Cluster\s+spots\s+for\s+June\s+10\/11\s+from\s+GB7DXM\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Sorry no Cluster spots for June 10/11 from GB7DXM (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 21:33:32 +0100; Hi All, there are no Cluster spots for LF on my local Cluster node again this week. There has been a lot of static , and there seemed very little activity this morning. Roll on the autumn (well maybe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00134.html (8,184 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Sorry no Cluster spots for June 10/11 from GB7DXM (score: 1): Author: "wolfgang koenig" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 23:19:17 -0700 (PDT); Hallo Group, we had some activity on LF last Monday (12. Jun) morning. The band was quiet without static crashes. I heared a few stations : DJ2EY 559, DL3FDO 559, DJ1RL 559 in qso with df8zr 559, DJ7; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00157.html (8,860 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]