Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Solar\s+flare\s+\-\s+X\-ray\s+flux\s+of\s+X4\.97\s+peaked\s+at\s+00\:49\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Solar\s+flare\s+\-\s+X\-ray\s+flux\s+of\s+X4\.97\s+peaked\s+at\s+00\:49\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Solar flare - X-ray flux of X4.97 peaked at 00:49 (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:41:08 +0100; Hello Uwe, VLF That solar flare, with a maximum X-ray flux of X4.97 peaked at 00:49 is not visible at your signal in my spectogram's, Uwe. I know, Sun was at other side of earth in relation to our QT; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00242.html (10,552 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Solar flare - X-ray flux of X4.97 peaked at 00:49 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:13:36 +0100; ok, Peter. we will see what Paul found out. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 25.02.2014 09:08 An: [email protected] Betreff: LF: Solar flare - X-ray flux of X4.97 p; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00645.html (9,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]