Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Slower\s+and\s+slower\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Slower\s+and\s+slower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Slower and slower (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:14:20 EST; << Using DFCW instead of QRSS will reduce the QSO time to abt. 1/3 and the required stability to 1/2 (0.02ppm). More sophisticated methods (FDK etc..) might even give better results. >> I wonder...wa; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00190.html (7,779 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Slower and slower (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:07:29; With tools as ARGO you can watch a 'frequency window' that is many hundred times the resolution, so I believe that accuracy is not so critical as the frequency stability. To take optimal advantage of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00191.html (10,582 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Slower and slower (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:55 EST; << There's nothing to stop you integrating a signal over days, except that the frequency stability and accuracy required (not the same thing) gets tighter and tighter. >> And, as Alberto pointed out,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00192.html (7,753 bytes)
4. LF: Slower and slower (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:48:31 +0100; You may not need to. There's hope for us low ERP guys yet, it seems that one just needs to go slower and slower. What about 300 second dots or 1000 second dots for VK and ZL? 73, John, G4CNN There's; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00197.html (9,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]