Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Slow\s+CW\s+vs\.\s+BPSK\.\s+\&\s+Computer\s+modes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Slow\s+CW\s+vs\.\s+BPSK\.\s+\&\s+Computer\s+modes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK. & Computer modes (score: 1): Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:21:17 +0100; This is all-important. Extremely weak stations require considerable additional work by the 'computer between the ears' to decipher what is signal and what is noise on the screen - just like aural Mor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00018.html (11,509 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK. & Computer modes (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 15:38:12 +0200; [snip] There seems to be no appreciation on this newsgroup of the real value of coherent detection - that is, having phase information available when the signal is decoded and coherently locking to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00024.html (9,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]