Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Signals\s+around\s+135\.923\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Signals\s+around\s+135\.923\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Signals around 135.923 (score: 1): Author: "Graham Phillips" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 10:06:16 +0100; Just in time Marcus .... was about to rip my signal generator apart !!! (Hi) Many thanks for the reports, 73 de Graham B. Phillips. G3XTZ. [email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00570.html (8,294 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Signals around 135.923 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 03:45:07 EST; Hi group, sri, when preparing "135K92ST.jpg", I got the frequency annotations wrong by 1 Hz. Should be 135.922 to 924, not 921 to 923. Good luck to all Markus, DF6NM; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00572.html (7,828 bytes)
3. LF: Signals around 135.923 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:40:27 EST; Hi group, thats a nice image on Argo tonight at 22:45, with seven closely cuddled stations: 925.0 weak carrier 924.15 ZP(V)? 10s/dot (good signal, but too fast for 21mHz) 923.4 G3XDV 10s/dot 923.0 M0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00576.html (8,307 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]