Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+reception\s+in\s+JN59WK\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+reception\s+in\s+JN59WK\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: SAQ reception in JN59WK (score: 1): Author: DK1IS <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:00:19 +0200; Hi group, good copy of the 1200 UTC SAQ transmission here in Eastern Bavaria (JN59WK) as usual. QRG was about 17.185 kHz. At home with SPM 30 with filter 24 Hz and active whip HE 011: -71 dBm resp. 0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00014.html (9,787 bytes)
2. Re: LF: SAQ reception in JN59WK (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:31:59 +0200; Hello all, SAQ was 30 dB above the noise floor here and the residual key-up carrier was about 17 dB weaker. If you can hear the latter, reception is good! The receiver here is a PERSEUS SDR and the a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00025.html (8,690 bytes)
3. Re: LF: SAQ reception in JN59WK (score: 1): Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:14:16 +0200; Hello Roelof, your 17dB agrees very well with my measurement made many years ago, I also found the "backwave" to be 17 dB below key-down power. Assuming the key-down output is 200kW, "only" 4000 watt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00026.html (9,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]